Blog Posts

Nov 24 2019

$1.9 Million Fraud Lawsuit – Won Defense Verdict

The plaintiff alleged a conspiracy to defraud her arising from transactions involving the sale of a ranch and Percheron horses. At trial, the plaintiff called defendant’s alleged co-conspirator to testify against Mr. Ochrach’s client. However, Mr. Ochrach had thoroughly investigated this witness and the plaintiff and, on cross-examination, impeached the witnesses almost every minute. In fact, after about 30 minutes of of cross-examination, the alleged co-conspirator — who was really a co-conspirator with the plaintiff — began pleading the 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to every question. Mr. Ochrach had destroyed his credibility.

In the end, the judge entered a decision exonerating Mr. Ochrach’s client of any wrongdoing — a complete defense victory.

Oct 12 2017

$21 Million Settlement of Breach of Contract case

Mr. Ochrach represented a local Sacramento television station in a lawsuit for breach of an option agreement to sell the TV station to a national television network. The defendant was a multi-billion- dollar company, and it hired one of the largest law firms in the country to fight the case. The defendant fought every issue like it was life or death. The defendant made relatively small settlement offers and promised to “crush” the local TV station.

The turning point case when Mr. Ochrach took the deposition of the CEO and founder of the National television network. The CEO was defended in his deposition by four lawyers – all from law schools like Harvard who objected to almost every question. They made this a very difficult deposition. Yet, Mr. Ochrach persisted and eventually cornered the CEO into giving testimony that revealed the truth – and was devastating to the defendant’s defense of the case. Mr. Ochrach then deposed two other senior executives of the National television network – again extracting key testimony for his client’s case.

Within months of taking these depositions, defense counsel’s negotiating position changed dramatically. The defendant was offering to pay twice what it had previously offered. Mr. Ochrach settled the case obtaining $21 million from the defendant.

Jun 08 2016

Financial Elder Abuse is a powerful and much overlooked legal theory

Business litigation involves claims for breach of contract, fraud, misappropriation and the like. But, if the plaintiff was 65 or more years old at the time of the offense, an additional claim for financial elder abuse must be considered. Why?

Because proving elder abuse opens up additional remedies not necessarily available for these other claims. For example, unless you’re suing over a contract that contains an attorneys’ fees clause, the plaintiff cannot recover her attorneys’ fees in business litigation. However, the elder abuse statutes change all of that. Welfare & Institutions Code § 15657.5 provides that, upon proof by a preponderance of the evidence “that a defendant is liable for financial abuse” under Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30, “in addition to [compensatory damages] all other remedies otherwise provided by law,” the court shall award attorney fees and costs, including the cost of the services of a conservator devoted to the litigation of a claim for financial abuse. Wood v. Jamison (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 156, 164-165. Moreover, attorneys’ fees are unilateral to the plaintiff only. Bell v. Mason (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1102.

In other words, not only does an elder abuse claim open up the possibility of recovering attorneys’ fees for the plaintiff, because this remedy is unilateral, even if the plaintiff loses her case, she will not be liable to the defendant for his attorneys’ fees. This is a very powerful claim.

In addition, upon proof by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant is liable for financial abuse, and upon clear and convincing evidence that a defendant has acted with recklessness, malice, fraud or oppression, general damages for pain and suffering may be imposed after the death of the victim. Absent an elder abuse claim, these damages would not be available in business litigation.

To the layman, these benefits of including a financial elder abuse claim in your lawsuit may not seem significant. But, this additional claim will change the entire nature of your lawsuit – and give you a powerful tool to achieve justice.

Nov 24 2015

KidsFirst – Helping Children and Families

I’m a member of the Board of Directors of Kids First, and I’d like to share some of the amazing things this organization does to help children and their families.

KidsFirst was established in 1989 as a private, non-profit organization to end child abuse and neglect – so that every child can live in a safe, healthy and nurturing environment.

Every day, we provide guidance, education and tools that help parents cope with life’s stressors. Helping parents helps their kids. For example, we offer co-parenting classes to teach divorced or separated moms and dads to engage in neutral communications in front of their children. They learn to increase positive communication, manage anger, decrease negative effects on children and enhance the child’s confidence and self-esteem.

KidsFirst also has counseling and family resource centers in Auburn, Roseville and partners with schools and faith-based organizations. We connect parents of all cultures and means to the proper resources and services to help them to be better parents.

Of course, KidsFirst was organized as the Child Abuse Prevention Council for Western and Southern Placer County. Our primary focus is to provide prevention and early intervention services to high-risk families so that child abuse and neglect can be deterred and to help those who have already suffered abuse or neglect. KidsFirst works closely with government and a county-wide collaborative of allied agencies to take every step possible to keep parents and kids together, including working directly with parents to help avoid abusive relationships.

Last year, KidsFirst served nearly 3,800 children and 2800 families through our direct programs and services, as well as reaching out to nearly 7,500 individuals in outreach events. All services are free and confidential and available in English and Spanish.

Nov 04 2015

How to Pick a Business Litigation Lawyer

As a business litigation attorney, I handle a wide array of cases, such as breach of contract, business fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, partnership disputes, corporate dissolutions, etc. Over the course of 28 years, I’ve noticed some things that I believe are essential in the choice and decision to hire a business litigation lawyer.

First, you need a smart and wise lawyer. Wisdom comes with time and experience. While I thought I knew it all when I was younger, I didn’t. Many years of experience in my profession developed the wisdom necessary to litigate more efficiently. Second, most business lawyers do not have any business education or experience. The typical lawyer studied political science or history in college, went to law school, and then found herself practicing business litigation. Many of those attorneys are excellent. However, I believe those lawyers who have accounting or economics degrees are better choices because they are equipped to handle many aspects of business litigation cases. For example, damages in business cases usually involve dealing with accounting records and lost revenue or profits calculations. Lawyers with college degrees in those areas or, better yet, experience practicing accounting or economics, are far more comfortable dealing with these issues – including cross-examining accounting and economics expert witnesses.

I have an accounting degree and worked as an auditor for one of the world’s largest public accounting firms before attending law school. I can tell you that my education and accounting experience help me every day in one aspect of a case or another. Choose your attorney with great care. The choice you make wlll have a significant impact on your results.